One of the huge differences between now and then is that, in
the 50s and 60s, it cost each time you took a photo. You had to buy film – which
was likely to be a roll of 127 or 120 size film on which you had sufficient to
take, I think, 12 photographs; if you were rich enough to afford a 35 mm
camera, then the choice was between a 20 or 36 cassette. Having used all your
film, you then had to get it developed – which cost money – and then decide
which of the pictures (which you had a negative of) was worth printing – and that
cost money too. The result of all this was that each shot was carefully taken
as it cost as much to take a bad photo as a good one. All the above relates to
black and white photography. Somewhere along the line came the option to have,
with 35 mm, colour slide or colour negative film – the slide, which gave a transparency,
was viewed by setting up a projector and screen and boring friends and
neighbours with your slides; the colour negative gave a colour print (more
money).
Those of us who remember how things were 50 years or more ago should take the time to make their memories available to younger people. A world without the internet, without on screen games and where direct face to face conversation substituted for texts, emails and so called social media - was it better? Was it worse? Whichever, it was certainly different. PLEASE do add comments - thank you. Search this blog using the search box at the bottom or choose a topic from the labels on the right.
Search for subjects on this blog
Wednesday, 3 July 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment