One of the huge differences between now and then is that, in
the 50s and 60s, it cost each time you took a photo. You had to buy film – which
was likely to be a roll of 127 or 120 size film on which you had sufficient to
take, I think, 12 photographs; if you were rich enough to afford a 35 mm
camera, then the choice was between a 20 or 36 cassette. Having used all your
film, you then had to get it developed – which cost money – and then decide
which of the pictures (which you had a negative of) was worth printing – and that
cost money too. The result of all this was that each shot was carefully taken
as it cost as much to take a bad photo as a good one. All the above relates to
black and white photography. Somewhere along the line came the option to have,
with 35 mm, colour slide or colour negative film – the slide, which gave a transparency,
was viewed by setting up a projector and screen and boring friends and
neighbours with your slides; the colour negative gave a colour print (more
money).
Those of us who remember how things were 50 years or more ago should take the time to make their memories available to younger people. A world without the internet, without on screen games and where direct face to face conversation substituted for texts, emails and so called social media - was it better? Was it worse? Whichever, it was certainly different. PLEASE do add comments - thank you. Search this blog using the search box at the bottom or choose a topic from the labels on the right.
Search for subjects on this blog
Showing posts with label 35 mm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 35 mm. Show all posts
Wednesday, 3 July 2013
Photography in the fifties and sixties
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)